Is Evangelicalism Sexist?

After two weeks we finished this chapter. Last week it was myself and two of you and this last Sunday we had a few more of you show up. We divvied up the chapter five ways and we each report on a section of the chapter. I enjoyed hearing from everyone and their contributions to each section. Like the chapters to come, Campolo isn't shy about what he believes. Although not all of us agreed with all of what Campolo was talking about I feel that these are important things that evangelicals should be talking about.

Women as preachers
Campolo starts these sections off by explaining , at a gathering of Cooperative Baptist Fellowship, how he declared the prevention of women from being ordained as an evil practice. He was told that these were heated words and there could have been a better way to express his feelings. He continues to explain why he believes it is evil to keep women from the pulpit by an explanation of 1 Timothy 2:11-12 which has been a scriptural basis for many in their belief of men only preachers. He also explains that the church being an institution that leaders are also able to be influenced by evil forces as described in Ephesians 6:12 .Campolo shares personal stories that has contributed to his belief in women preaching and teaching. I shared another interpretation of the 1 Timothy passage that explains, in my mind, why Paul was not forbidding women to teach but more so new believers who happened to be women due to the surrounding religious Diana cult and culture. Click to here to download a copy of my former professor's (Kenneth Waters) article that was published in a European theological journal. It's a little on the technical side but worth reading.

C is Cookie and S is for Submission
Campolo points out of the church's reinforcement of society's stratification of the genders. Namely, he points out how Promise Keepers although has made positive contributions to the outside world such as repenting of racist and sexual sin but still upholds the "head of the household" role for men. Interestingly enough although Campolo would say that Promise Keepers has reinforced an old idea of what it means to be manly, an article in Biola Connections magazine called, "The Feminization of the Church" charges that the church and promise keepers are to "girly" for many men. If you want to read the article, you can do so here. We discussed that Religiousness seems to be overgeneralized as "girly" and that certain spiritual concepts end up looking weak such as: compassion, sacrifice, pacifism, and etc. As far as marriage, Campolo seems to be more of an Egalitarian, where he would contend that the marriage is a equal partnership not as some would derive from Ephesians 5:22-24. One person during our study shared that they disagreed with Campolo's view on marriage and so to look at the two ways Christians may view marriage here's an article from Christianity Today. This is interesting when you are dating someone and thinking of marriage. It can be difficult if you as a guy who believes a women should do house stuff and she believes in working a job. Or if you're a women and you believe that your mate should support you and then your husband sees you as lazy.

Feminists vs. Evangelicals and Ying and Yang
Many would believe that feminism in the Evangelical "F" word. Here Campolo talks about how Feminists and Evangelicals need not to be at each other's throats. Although issues such as abortion do keep Feminists and Evangelicals apart, Campolo argues that they have more common than some Evangelicals may recognize. One example that I found, was while listening to KPFK (a progressive non-corporate sponsored radio channel) a women who is considered a feminist, talked about women, marriage, and children She felt that many women have felt trapped into marriage by wedlock or saw marriage as a vehicle for having children. She mentioned that women should be able to make their own choices on career and marriage. Sound like a commercial for abortion? Maybe not, if we provided more resources to young people other than the opposite of an Nike ad (Just don't do it) and made sex a more comfortable subject to talk about than maybe abstinence would seem so difficult. There also seems to be a large push from the "court don't date" crowd for Christians to find a mate and many would approve of early marriage. What do you if you are seventeen and you just want to hang out with the opposite sex? Although I believe abstinence is the best option for Christians, what happens when you have the hormonal teenage couple who have put themselves in a pickle and do not use preventive measures and a baby shows up? Yes it is true that a condom does not cover the heart, but a condom looks a lot better than thought of abortion, the difficulty of adoption, or the challenge of being a parent. Then again condoms don't always work. In any case, Evangelicals should be encouraging of Women defining their relationship and plan' by what God would have them do, which is not always about who one is marry and how many children to have. Although these things are important, it is a woman's dedication to Jesus and her contribution to the kingdom that is far more important than "finding a man." In fact the Apostle Paul writes,"Now for the matters you wrote about: It is good for a man not to marry. But since there is so much immorality, each man should have his own wife, and each woman her own husband." 1 Corinthians 7:1-2 Still, being horny is not a good reason to get married.

Lastly, Campolo talks about Yin and Yang and how the church has polar opposites in theology and prayer due to masculine and feminine qualities. He writes about how God/Jesus is whole encompassing both types of qualities.

"I am not advocating what might be called 'the feminist agenda', with any of variant expressions. What I am suggesting here is that Evangelicals abandon the stereotypical differentiations of male and female and find in Christ the declaration of a new humanity that He incarnates for all of us."
-Tony Campolo